The Nisqually earthquake, on the other hand, was the most recent big earthquake in western Washington. On Monday, the tenth anniversary will be celebrated. It was ten times the size of the one in New Zealand, but it was buried ten times deeper.
Here's an example of a comparison:
Earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, on February 22, 2011:
6.3 magnitude, 3.1 mile depth
12:51 p.m. is the current time.
The Nisqually earthquake struck on February 28, 2001.
Depth - 32 miles Magnitude - 6.8
10:54 a.m. is the time of day.
According to preliminary estimates, the forces felt on the ground in New Zealand would have been three to four times stronger than the worst shaking from the Nisqually quake.
Vince Stricherz of the University of Washington has posted an excellent look back at the Nisqually earthquake and some lessons learnt since then. For example, we now have more accurate maps of which neighborhoods pose the greatest threat, and more older structures have been fortified.
Nonetheless, the damage in a city with current building rules (as opposed to a city like Port-au-Prince, Haiti) should serve as a wake-up call in Seattle, Portland, and everywhere in between.
"I believe the damage would be bigger here than in New Zealand," Vidale says, "since we are much more built up and have a lot of ancient things erected before we knew we had significant earthquakes here."
Simple precautions, such as tying down your water heater, fortifying your chimney, and having an emergency bag and a plan, are recommended by disaster planners.